Felled by Guns, Germs, and Steel

After it was so highly recommended by both Jason and even an old colleague, I picked up Guns, Germs and Steel by Jared Diamond. After pushing through nearly 130 pages, I am abandoning the mission. Even the 130 pages was probably about 30 pages of cheating (= skimming.) The level of detail regarding carbon dating seemed like knowledge that I could flip back to if it became relevant later on.

I think I finally realized, after questioning Jason whether there was some exciting plot twist I should be looking forward to (not really), that G,G,&S may be a book that people are proud to boast that they have read, rather than a book they actually enjoyed reading.

Jason will on occasion scoff at my interest in fiction, insisting that after finishing a work of fiction I don't walk away with any useful learning in my head. Fair enough, although I point to the fact that it broadens my vocabulary. (More so than his books that carry titles like Java Servlets or LINUX in a Nutshell.) And fiction can be far more entertaining, especially compared to G,G,&S.

Not to wimp out entirely I have traded in the 512 page G,G,&S for the 992 page Team of Rivals by Doris Kearnes Goodwin. I gave it to Jason for a birthday, or maybe Christmas. By the creaking sound of the opening spine when I picked it up, I don't think he's read it yet. After 50 pages last night, I have more faith in completing this book. And if so, I will boast of it later.
I see on amazon that there's an G,G,&S DVD, maybe if winter lasts those extra weeks that the groundhog predicted this might be something to consider.

Comments

Anonymous said…
The Rise of Theodore Rex is another great one. :)
Anonymous said…
I would also try "The Worst Hard Time: The Untold Story of Those Who Survived the Great American Dust Bowl " by Timothy Egan. It is non-fiction, but you hardly even notice! Although it jumps around a bit, I still enjoyed it very much.
-Juliet
abby said…
DKG came to a class of mine to speak about the Lincoln book. She didn't seem at all troubled to be speaking about a book that she didn't actually write.
Claire said…
Ouch! That's a pretty snarky comment, do you want to explain?

I know she confessed to plagarism ~5 years ago... but I don't think that means that she hasn't written a word of her own since.
abby said…
But that was part of the fun: she fessed up that she hadn't written her books for years, and that she's always relied on the kindness of strangers... the poor grad students who were the ones that were the plagerists!

She did probably write that book about growing up a fan of the Brooklyn Dodgers.

I did not like the professor who thought we were going to be reverent when he brought the esteemed DKG to our first class. She and this prof meet and bonded in Fox News' green room (no kidding).
Claire said…
Fair enough. It's true that this seems to be the dirty little secret of academic publishing: desperate overworked grad students doing the research and probably a lot of writing while the named author goes on The Daily Show and Meet the Press to take all the credit (and the Pulitzers.) But I guess you could argue that those grad students couldn't have pulled together the same feat without the direction and vision of the author?

Popular Posts